Hello Ed,
Thank you for you and Cynthia's support . . . it is very much appreciated.
We spoke to Dr. Bergman, his Urologist, the one who suggested the BCG's and CT scans (that would mean 4 CT scans over the course of the next 3 months). We spoke with him this last Tuesday and I took him to task about his recommendations.
Apprently, because the CT scan he took last week showed no cancer because the cancerous tumors were removed 2 months ago. I have to confirm this again, but I think he said there was no sign of in situ either, which doesn't sound quite right.
Since my husband is now deamed cancer free, Dr. Bergman is now recommending that my husgand do the BCG's and CT scans and wait and see if the cancer returns. If it does, then we've agreed to go ahead with the surgery.
My husband doesn't see any reason to have the surgery if he's now in what looks like remission. However, Dr. Bergman said that the in situ will most certainly come back at some point.
So now it was my turn to ask questions and voice concerns and my husband was becoming more and more upset.
I told Dr. Bergman that although, from his observation, that my husband is a healthy, strong 68 year old man, I said "You don't live with him and you really don't have any idea what he goes through day to day and he agreed.
I also asked him that when the in situ returns, can he guarantee that it won't come back even more agressively and land outside his bladder wall and he said no he couldn't guarantee anything,
Dr. Bergman left the room and it was very clear that my husband and I and the doctor are at odds. When he came back, he suggested we meet with the surgery team and discuss it further, so we're going in tomorrow.
I will most certainly ask about second opinions and hospitals as well.
I know the fear and sheer terror of this cystectomy is driving him, but Cynthia's doctor is right. This is a poweder keg waiting to explode. I just hope tomorrow will yield a better decision.
Rayn