Good question to ask but since the recovery time is so flippin' slow...I agree with Pat, that in fairness to ourselves and others, we need six months or more to really determine all the pros and cons.
My husband thinks I am doing very well considering the person I am and what I have been through since my initial diagnosis in March. But as usual, my expectations are too high and so I have been disappointed with some of my recovery efforts. I have loved my dear "Rosebud", my stoma since first meeting her, but I don't love having to search and explore for pockets of urine and having to contort into all sorts of positions at times to empty...and I miss terribly the feeling of relief from having a good pee.
When I empty, no matter how full I am, I never have a sense of relief...unless I have been having cramps. I don't like how I often feel
"raw" inside and wonder why some days I feel OK and other days, like today, kinda crampy, even after getting empty...but maybe that is not the Indiana pouch but just me. ???
I don't like the idea that during the day I can't predict if I will need to empty in 90 mins. or 3 hrs. but I love the idea that I am now able to sleep for 5 or 6 hrs. at night and I can roll over to sleep comfortably on either side. So I think there will always be plus and minus to each diversion. As for that question....My spouse asked me two weeks ago if he came down with BC, would I recommend chemo and surgery to him. I said, "no, right now I would not because the pain is too fresh in my mind and I still have the after effects that present me with plenty of challenges...however, I added, "ask me one year after the surgery. I know things will change and along with that, my opinion. Melodie