Suspicious scope worried about non-BCG options

1 year 4 months ago #61513 by joea73
Hi Shacky73,

Thanks for posting your experience.  We all learn from it.  In The Paris Reporting System (published in 2015)  If cytology says "High grade urothelial carcinoma"  it is high  grade with 90%+probability, "Suspicious for high grade urothelial carcinoma" 50%+ ," Atypical urothelial cells"  8-35% probability of being high grade.    I think different urologists approaches Atypical in cytology, and it seems your urologist has  taken an aggressive way to make sure, which is a good thing.

 It sounds like you had 6 weeks induction and 3 sets of 3 weeks maintenance treatment, so you have completed the most important part of BCG treatment.  I recall Alan had 6 weeks induction and another 6 weeks treatment as maintenance.   I was a bit surprised to hear that your urologist stopped the treatment because of the reaction, rather than continuing with reduced dose.   I heard Dr. Lerner of Baylor College saying recently that in the SWOG`1602 clinical trial to compare MERCK Tice  strain BCG vs Tokyo-172 strain BCG, had seen effective immune response by reducing the dosage to 1/2.1/3, 1/10, 1/30, 1/100 rather than abandoning potential effective therapy.  But, your urologist at Moffit likely decided giving a break to the bladder was more appropriate.   

Re:  Treatment for BCG Unresponsive.

I do not know if your situation is BCG Unresponsive as BCG has been working over a year and the treatment was stopped because of side effects.    So, you may be categorized as BCG intolerable.  Anyway,  as Alan mentioned, there are a few FDA approved treatment for BCG Unresponsive and there are several treatments which are on clinical trials.  

There are two FDA approved treatment for BCG Unresponsive non muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Valrubicin- VALSTAR(R)  approved in 1998.     Approved for BCG Unresponsive CIS.  So, this drug may not be applicable for BCG Unresponsive for T1HG.   Anyway, this drug was not that effective such that though of 90 patients 19 (21%) had a complete response, including 7 who remained disease-free at the last evaluation, with a median followup of 30 months.  

Pembrolizumab - Keytruda (R) approved in 2020.  Pembrolizumab is systemic immunotherapy drug.   It is administered also via vein for BCG Unresponsive.  The treatment is for BCG Unresponsive CIS and BCG Unresponsive HG.   This treatment was better than Vlrubicin but not as good as expected, less than 20% complete response at 2 years.  So, FDA approved in split decision.  

GEM/DOC sequential treatment.  This treatment did not require FDA clinical trial as both Gemcitabine and Docetaxel are generic drugs.  The treatment was pioneered by University of Iowa team and now have been adopted by many academic hospitals because it is much less expensive than Pembrolizumab immunotherapy drug, better efficacy and less side effects.  Gemcitabine is instilled into bladder first and held for 1-2 hours, then voided, then Docetaxel is instilled into bladder and held for 1-2 hours and voided.  Someone posted that Docetaxel was like water.  Side effects of Gemcitabine and Docetaxel are less that Mitomycin which you had been treated before.
Though BCG relies on immune response to BCG bacteria and BCG infected cells to kill cancer cells, GEM/DOC stops cancer cells to divide and leads to the death of cancer cells.  

Drugs on clinical trials for BCG Unresponsive
There are several clinical trials going on for BCG Unresponsive.  Below are a couple of treatments which are on Phase III trials with good results with high expectation to receive FDA approval.

IL-15RFc by Immunity Bio.   Natural Killer cells (innate immune)  are known to kill cancer cells when they are invoked by BCG.  But, it has been observed that some of NK cells are invoked but do not attack the cancer cells, and those inactive NK cells are activated by Interleukin 15, which is immune system related stimulator.   The result of clinical trial 3 showed 71% complete response rate at 2 years and 48% for HG at 2 years.    It turned out that IL-15RFc alone  is not as effective as Il-15RFC + BCG.

CG0070 is Oncolytic Adenovirus. Adenovirus is virus which causes common cold but toxin which causes cold had been engineeringly removed.    CG0070 selectively enters in to cancer cells and replicate themselves.   It also contains drug to stimulate anti-tumor responses.  More recently,  CG0070 + immunotherapy Pembrolizumab combination improved its efficacy with complete response rate at 12 months to be 89% (n=16/18) at 12 months.    

best
The following user(s) said Thank You: Alan, Shacky73

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

1 year 4 months ago - 1 year 4 months ago #61512 by Alan
Shacky73,

All I can add is Moffitt has a very good reputation. They may have access to some trials or get a second opinion at MD Anderson as they seem to be the cutting edge of things. After that, yes, a cystectomy is probably your best option for life if it has come back. There have been lots of success stories on this forum from those that have done this.

DX 5/6/2008 TAG3 papillary tumor .5 CM in size. 2 TURBS followed by 6 instillations of BCG weekly with a second round of 6 after a 6 week wait.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Shacky73

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

1 year 4 months ago #61510 by Shacky73
Replied by Shacky73 on topic Suspicious scope worried about non-BCG options
I will keep positive attitude and hopefully it isn’t a return of the CA or CIS.

And if I need radical surgery I know I will be OK as well.  

T1 Grade 3 with CIS

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

1 year 4 months ago #61509 by Shacky73
Replied by Shacky73 on topic Suspicious scope worried about non-BCG options

I knew about the G and D drugs.  But I think it’s same methodology - drug irritates bladder starting auto immune response killing off cancer cells.

problem is my bladder may not be able to go through any more regardless of the drug.

T1 Grade 3 with CIS

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

1 year 4 months ago - 1 year 4 months ago #61506 by Alan
There are other agents that can be used. Some of these have been discussed 12-18 months ago on this site. I simply have too many other items I must take of today to search those.. I have not kept up with whoever posted these. Perhaps they can chime in again. Seems like I remember a doxetal (sp?) combined with something else. All I know is there are other options. I would guess your URO is familiar with these.

The waiting is probably the worst part. The best thing I have learned is simply wait as so many times are not as bad as they appear. One day at a time!

DX 5/6/2008 TAG3 papillary tumor .5 CM in size. 2 TURBS followed by 6 instillations of BCG weekly with a second round of 6 after a 6 week wait.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

1 year 4 months ago #61505 by Shacky73
Had scope last week at Moffitt.  Lots of damage from 7 previous TURBT’s + 6 mitomycin and 15 Tokyo BCG.  My BCG was stopped after March 2021 due to reactions and impact on bladder.  

I had been negative for a year prior to stopping and scopes were clear till last September when there were suspicious areas but nothing definitive.  Last September cytology was atypical hence the scheduling of next scope in 3 months instead of 6.

I was pretty anxious this go around as my urgency hasn’t improved at all since 2021 and the thought that I’ve been told I can’t have anymore BCG.

My doctor decided to schedule OR to make sure the not so normal areas are OK as well as place another stent in my right ureter which has been partially blocked and had stent back in 2020.

Waiting for cytology as well.

Trying to stay positive and calm.  The waiting periods are the worse.  What’s bothering me this time is what are the non-BCG options?  Since I’ve been told no more BCG I’m assuming surgery is only option if my T1HG w CIS returns.

T1 Grade 3 with CIS

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: Cynthiaeddieksara.anne