Home Forums All Categories Non Invasive Bladder Cancer Hexvix-blue light cystoscopy article

  • Hexvix-blue light cystoscopy article

    Posted by wendy on July 23, 2007 at 12:29 pm

    http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/77397.php

    “A comparative study between GE Healthcare’s Hexvix® fluorescence cystoscopy and white light cystoscopy has shown that Hexvix® cystoscopy is more effective in the detection of Ta and T1 papillary lesions than white light1 cystoscopy alone in 29% patients. The study has been published in this month’s Journal of Urology issue.”

    We’ve already seen that it’s usefulness in detecting CIS is confirmed (http://blcwebcafe.org/hexvix.asp), now this phase III trial reported by American experts is claiming it’s effectiveness at diagnosing more papillary tumors.

    Very interesting.

    I would think there is enough data now to get this tool approved for use in the US.

    Wendy

    wendy replied 16 years, 3 months ago 3 Members · 5 Replies
  • 5 Replies
  • wendy

    Member
    March 18, 2008 at 7:11 pm

    For sure in Nijmegan, and probably at NKI/Amsterdam and Erasmus in Rotterdam though I’m not sure about the last two. You should ask!

    Wendy

  • Zzazzip

    Member
    March 18, 2008 at 6:54 pm

    Hello,

    Does anybody know in what Hospitals in Holland they perform cystoscopie with the Hexvix/blue light methode?

    Thanx

  • Guest
    July 29, 2007 at 6:24 pm

    yeah……it was just confusing……didn’t know if it only worked in 29% the way it was worded….but your explanation makes more sense……..Pat

  • wendy

    Member
    July 29, 2007 at 2:28 pm

    Hi Pat,
    From my understanding–I don’t have access to the J of U (but almost all the articles are free in the month of Feb), haven’t seen the whole article but I would think that means the other 71% of pts did not have more tumors found by using additional blue light to the white light cystoscopy.

    You think?
    Wendy

  • Guest
    July 25, 2007 at 2:02 am

    What happened with the other 71%? Pat

Log in to reply.