Confusing statistics?

17 years 1 month ago #4067 by wendy
Replied by wendy on topic Confusing statistics?
There is a strange lack of long term studies for T1 tumors, but an excellent article has recently been published on the subject of T1 tumors treated with BCG:

Urology
Volume 69, Issue 1 , January 2007, Pages 78-82
For the full article, online free:
www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6VJW-4MY1VKJ-W&_user=10&_coverDate=01%2F31%2F2007&_rdoc=25&_fmt=full&_orig=browse&_srch=doc-info(%23toc%236105%232007%23999309998%23643145%23FLA%23display%23Volume)&_cdi=6105&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_ct=64&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=c4eb62609ecf93b0cba74b87d8d9b06c

Long-Term Follow-up of Patients with Stage T1 High-Grade Transitional Cell Carcinoma Managed by Bacille Calmette-Guérin Immunotherapy
David Margela, b, Corresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author, Raanan Tala, b, Shai Golana, b, Dani Kedara, b, Dov Engelsteina, b and Jack Baniela, b

aInstitute of Urology, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Campus, Petah Tiqwa, Israel
bTel Aviv University Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel

Received 23 February 2006; accepted 8 September 2006. Available online 30 January 2007.


Abstract
Objectives

To report the long-term outcome of patients with Stage T1 high-grade transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder treated initially by transurethral resection and adjuvant intravesical bacille Calmette-Guérin.
Methods

From June 1984 to November 1995, 78 consecutive patients with Stage T1 high-grade bladder cancer underwent transurethral resection and adjuvant intravesical bacille Calmette-Guérin therapy. The results at the interim follow-up (median 56 months) were reported in 1998. The median duration of follow-up for the present study was 107 months (range 16 to 238). The endpoints were tumor recurrence (Stage Ta, T1, or Tis), tumor progression (to T2 or greater), and disease-specific survival.
Results

Of the 78 patients, 34 (44%) were alive for the present analysis and 44 (56%) had died, 12 (16%) of transitional cell carcinoma and 32 (72%) of other causes. Recurrence was documented in 27 patients (35%) at a median of 8.5 months (range 5 to 129) after treatment, and progression in 14 patients (18%) at a median of 31.4 months (range 5 to 88) after treatment. The 2, 5, and 10-year recurrence-free survival and progression-free survival rates were 76%, 72%, and 62% and 92%, 82%, and 80%, respectively. The corresponding disease-free survival rates were 99%, 90%, and 85%. Disease progression occurred in 10 (37%) of 27 patients with recurrence, of whom 9 died. Of the 14 patients with disease progression, 12 died of their disease.
Conclusions

Bacille Calmette-Guérin is an effective conservative treatment for patients with Stage T1 high-grade bladder cancer. More than one half the recurrences appeared within the first year, but a small risk remains throughout the patient’s life. Progression during follow-up appears to carry a high risk of cancer-specific death.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

17 years 1 month ago #4049 by cta7978
Replied by cta7978 on topic Confusing statistics?
Bob,

Yeah the statistics can be kind of hairy. I think that they probably didn't have very many T1 G2's in the EORTC study (if any) because it seems to give the same statistical prognosis as the T1 G1's.

I don't believe the 52% statistic. You should read the supporting studies for the EORTC risk anaysis program (I have a copy) - pretty good stuff. I was diagnosed with a single T1G3 (2cm) about a year ago and have poured over the statistics like you seem to be doing. EORTC tables were the best data I was able to find. I would guess that your stats would be somewhere between the 6% quoted for the T1G1's and the 17% quoted for the T1G3's for 5 year probablity of progression.

The 52% statistic could refer to untreated BC (i.e. no BCG and/or no TURB), or it could refer to T1G2's with co-contaminant CIS (which seems to have a worse prognosis). I'm just guessing here as I have not seen the reference.

Chris A.
Diagnosed T1G3 - 3/01/06
37 yo, Seattle, WA

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

17 years 1 month ago #4040 by Bob_P
Confusing statistics? was created by Bob_P
In the EORTC Bladder Risk Table
A tumor like I had (T1, G2) has a .06 chance of progression after 5 years.
I'm guessing this means 6%
In the book 100 Questions and Answers About Bladder Cancer (Ellsworth & Carswell), they say a tumor with a grade of G2 has a 52% chance of becoming invassive.
Seems like a large discrepency. I'd like to go with the first statistic but can anyone explain the big difference?
Thanks, Bob P.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: Cynthiaeddieksara.anne