It has been known that cancer cells tend to have multiple chromosomes. It has been known that chromosomes 3, 7 and 17 are associated with bladder cancer when multiple copies of chromosomes 3,7, 17 are found in urothelial cells. UroVysion uses patter recognition tool FISH ( Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization) to find out if there are multiple copies of chromosome 3,7,17 in cells.
Humans have 23 pairs of chromosomes - one from father and the other from mother which are stored in the nucleus of each cell. 22 pairs (chromosome 1 to 22) are the same in the father (male) and the mother (female). So, a normal cell has two chromosome 3s, two chromosome 7s and two chromosome 17s and other 19 pairs of other chromosomes, and 23d pair of sex chromosomes.
Abnormal hybridization pattern exhibiting numerical abnormalities of chromosomes 3, 7, and 17 means UroVysion found in urine sample several cells which have more than 2 chromosome 3, more than 2 chromosome 7, and more than 2 chromosome 17.
For UroVysion, A positive test result was defined as one of the following: the presence of 4 or more morphologically abnormal cells of 25 analyzed cells that showed polysomy of 2 or more chromosomes 3, 7, and 17 in the same cell.
In terms of Chromosome 9, the lack (missing) of a certain section of Chromosome 9 is known to be associated with bladder cancer. So, UroVysion checks how many cells' chromosome 9 are missing the specific section. Because your FISH result says Abnormal hybridization pattern exhibiting numerical abnormalities of chromosomes 3, 7, 9 and 17, they found that chromosome 9 in some cells in the urine is missing the specific section. To call it positive for bladder cancer, the analysis has to find 12 or more cells of which chromosome 9 is missing the specific section.
Those counting of cells with abnormal number of chromosome 3,17,17 and cells with chromosome 9 which is missing the specific section are done manually by a technician or automatically. Then a pathologist checks the report and gives a verdict.
I do not understand that FISH said POSITIVE but ATYPICAL. Did the report used the word POSITIVE? Then I do not know what made the pathologist to say Atypical.
The lab who conducted UroVysion Fish test of your urine, should have more detail information of their analysis. For example, they should have the data exactly how many cells had chromosome 9 which was missing the specific section, and how many copies of chromosome 3,7, and 17 are found in each abnormal cell.
best