I asked the same thing when my journey started.
Radical cystectomy seems to be the gold standard for the more aggressive cancers. There are procedures that are bladder sparing but the numbers for survival and qualty of life just don’t stack up to RC in the long run. If your a good candidate health and age wise for RC and neobladder it could be your best option. Going by the statistics, RC w/neo was the treatment I chose so I could watch my kids grow up.
The consensus for RC, if you go this route, is to go for a doctor that does a lot of RC’s a year, the outcomes are better. Talk to your doctor and don’t be afraid to ask questions and never be afraid to ask for a 2nd or 3rd opinion.
Bill
5.24.10 Final staging T2G3 7.28.10 Started Gemcitabine, Cisplatin neoadjunctive chemotherapy
11.2.10 RC with NEO 11.18.11 First year CT shows possible liver tumor
12.8.11 Confirmation of TCC BC mets to the liver 6.27.12 Final round of Dose Dense MVAC
7.26.12 Final scans showed no tumor or no metabolic response10.18.12 Wife leaves, now a single dad
10.31.12 New scans show metastic return to liver 2.4.13 New scans for treatment, no other sites found
2.20.13 New chemo regiment started, will run at least 12 weeks
CIS is considered “high grade” which means it has the potential to spread rather quickly, if it is not stopped. Bladder removal is a true “cure” if it has not spread. While of course it is not a pleasant experience, from what I have read here, it is life-saving. If I ever face what you are facing, I know that this would be the right/only way to go.
I am sure you will be getting advice from others on the list with more personal experience than I have. But I know they will advise you to get opinions from medical centers where there is real expertise in this.
Good luck to you…
Sara Anane
Diagnosis 2-08 Small papillary TCC; CIS
BCG; BCG maintenance
Vice-President, American Bladder Cancer Society
Forum Moderator
Sign In to reply