Home › Forums › All Categories › Non Invasive Bladder Cancer › BUMMER II
-
BUMMER II
Posted by cljjlk on December 3, 2009 at 1:35 pmI didn’t want to hoard in on Don’s “Bummer” discussion, so I will start a second BUMMER area. To bring you up to date on my situation; in August with my quarterly cysto and subsequent TURBT they found and removed a small (2 mm) TAG3 tumor. I did 6 weeks of BCG and then about 10 days ago went in for another TURBT. I got the result yesterday and the results were positive again. BUMMER!! The initial report stated small (.5 mm) non-invasive high grade. It also said there was not enough positive cells to tell if it was papillary or not (don’t understand that). MY Uro. said he was totally surprised because on examination it had all the appearance of an irritated area. He said it was so small that he missed it on the first pass, but found it when he returned to look at the area again. As before, he wants to send it up to John Hopkins for their Pathologist to further analyze. At a minimum, it will be back for another 6 weeks of BCG and a return TURBT. BUMMER AGAIN! My questions to the group, is a second series of BCG the normal protocol for a reoccurrence this quickly? Does the reoccurrence in the same area indicate anything or just a coincidence? If you were in my shoes, would you be seeking a second opinion or would wait to see how things develop after a second round of BCG? As always, I appreciate your opinions and support.
Chuck :unsure:
dx – Aug 2005
Five reoccurences (last 12/09 Ta high grade)
BCG Started 10/09 (2 6wk treatment)
BCG Maintenance started 4/10replied 15 years, 2 months ago 6 Members · 9 Replies9 Replies-
GuestDecember 4, 2009 at 8:12 pm
Chuck..the fact that the tumor is in the same area is a pretty good indication that the surgeon did not get all the margins and it re-seeded. It happens more than you would imagine.
In fact it happened to me. I chose to have my second opinion 9 days after my TURB at MSK in NYC..and the top surgeon there went back in 2 days later and got the margins the first surgeon missed.
A pretty good center in Florida is the Moffitt Center..at least NCI approved. Do not know anyone in particular to recommend however but here’s a link to look over.
http://www.moffitt.org/Site.aspx?spid=BF72D4455066450A96F788D72D1E2187&type=PhysSearchByProg&progname=Genitourinary+Oncology&SearchType=Physician
As for the Cleveland Clinic in Weston here is a physician pretty well known but not sure if he’s mired in paperwork or surgery ??
http://my.clevelandclinic.org/staff_directory/staff_display.aspx?doctorid=13592If you can go out of state..i’d opt for Johns Hopkins and Dr. Mark Schoenberg…he’s tops
http://urology.jhu.edu/markschoenberg/index.php
Pat -
Thanks Mike and Jack, you answered my questions. My plan now is to go this one more round with the BCG and the follow up TURBT providing the report from John Hopkins comes back the same as the initial local report. If we still have problems, then I’ll be off to seek a second opinion from someone that has more expertise. I also think that John Hopkins has a clinic in the local area, but I’m not sure what their specialty is. My current Uro is the second one I have had since my original discovery. I lost confidence and patience with the last doctor and especially with his staff. The current one (L. Kaufman) has an excellent reputation and he and his staff treat me like they really care. Again guys, thank you for your support and advice. Chuck
dx – Aug 2005
Five reoccurences (last 12/09 Ta high grade)
BCG Started 10/09 (2 6wk treatment)
BCG Maintenance started 4/10Hi Chuck
This group encouraged me to get a 2nd opinion. I am so glad they did, it put my mind at ease.
I had my path reports and slides sent from the lab by my Uro to the cancer PMH hospital. Because my Uro had did such a good job of getting biopsies, there was no need for a further Turbt to be done at the cancer hospital. This was told to me by the 2nd opinion Uro, who is one of the top Uros in Canada.
He agreed with my stage and grade of all tumors and agreed with my treatment regime. He actually told me that I was in very good hands and thinks very highly of my Uro.
This my friend did more for me than you could ever imagine.
I began to sleep better, my attitude changed and I began to learn everything I could about bladder cancer so I could assist fellow warriors with my experiences.
I can never thank Cynthia, Pat,Julie,Doug and Anita, Char, Nix, LadyJane, Ed, Sailer, Knut, and Mike and so many others enough.
I wish you all the best,
Jack
TA Grade 1
3 Turbts
30 BCG Treatments
Cancer Free since Nov 2007Chuck,
John Hopkins and MD Anderson are definately top bladder cancer centers. I’m not so sure that a “branch” of Cleveland Clinic would qualify. Patricia knows the ins and outs of the best docs in the field so maybe she can weigh in on that.
It sounds like they did not get good margins either time. Having pathology done over at John Hopkins is great and that is a key part of the expertise they bring to the table.
It sounds like a reTURBT (even prior to additional BCG) is warranted to ensure there is proper staging. There should be good margins. Ef they didn’t get it all the first time, is it really a recurrence (or just “the rest of it”)?
Sounds like you have a great doc. It is common for non-bladder cancer center surgeons to get insufficient margins and also understage.
The reason I suggest going to a cancer center surgeon at this point is primarily the preceding paragraph.
Hope that clarifies things for you and I things go well.
Mike
Age 54
10/31/06 dx CIS (TisG3) non-invasive (at 47)
9/19/08 TURB/TUIP dx Invasive T2G3
10/8/08 RC neobladder(at 49)
2/15/13 T4G3N3M1 distant metastases(at 53)
9/2013 finished chemo -cancer free again
1/2014 ct scan results….distant mets
2/2014 ct result…spread to liver, kidneys, and lymph system
My opinions are my own and do not reflect the opinion of ABLCS or anyone else. I am not a doctor nor do I play one on TV.Thank you all for your response and advice. I understand the wisdom behind obtaining a second opinion prior to having any change in treatment or a cystectomy. But why the urgency to go to a Cancer Center at this point? What I have read here at this site and others, the standard treatment is BCG or BCG with Interferon. My Uro. stated depending on the report coming back from John Hopkins, he may go with the BCG with Interferon. In addition; in my opinion, by him sending my test data (FISH, etc.) along with the biopsy it is like getting a second opinion. Isn’t John Hopkins considered one of the better cancer centers for BC? Please don’t take this wrong, I’m not questioning your advice or you opinion, but rather I’m trying to pick your brain as to why you feel so strongly that you would advice to urgently get to a Cancer Center. I live in the SE Florida region and we have a branch of the Cleveland Clinic Medical System. I know Cleveland Clinic is considered a leader in colon/rectal cancer, but I’m not sure how they rank for BC. If I chose to go to a cancer center, would Cleveland Clinic be on your recommended list? Like so many of us that are fighting this disease, we value the advice of those that have preceded us and have the wisdom of experience. Thanks, Chuck :unsure:
dx – Aug 2005
Five reoccurences (last 12/09 Ta high grade)
BCG Started 10/09 (2 6wk treatment)
BCG Maintenance started 4/10I couldn’t agree more with the suggestions….Get to a Bladder cancer center ASAP. The earlier the treatment the easier.
I always tell my doctor, “You know, I felt absolutly fine when we first met. And then you have made a huge change in my life” His answer is always said with a smile “I gave you this new life. And isn’t it Grand?”George
Light a man a fire and he is warm for an evening.
Light a man ON fire and he’s warm forever.08/08/08…RC neo bladder
09/09/09…New Hip
=
New Man! [/size]Hi Chuck
I agree with Mike, get to a cancer center that deals with bladder cancer on a daily basis.
I would get re biopsied at the cancer center, then discuss your results with a top Uro.
If you are still TA High Grade, BCG could be still a possible option or a different agent, BCG/Interferon, MMC, or Valstar.
If you were T1 High Grade with a recurrence different story.
I was TA low grade with 2 early recurrences during BCG. I have finished weekly and maintenance treatments and have been clear over 2 years.
The difference here is that I was Low grade and your tumor(s) were High grade.
I wish you all the best,
Jack
TA Grade 1
3 Turbts
30 BCG Treatments
Cancer Free since Nov 2007Chuck
Strongly consider discussing cystectomy after a recurrence of high-grade. Get to a bladder cancer center right away to discuss it.
If you haven’t seen the treatment guide for patient’s I put together, check in the blog section. Kind of walks you through the whole process.
Mike
Age 54
10/31/06 dx CIS (TisG3) non-invasive (at 47)
9/19/08 TURB/TUIP dx Invasive T2G3
10/8/08 RC neobladder(at 49)
2/15/13 T4G3N3M1 distant metastases(at 53)
9/2013 finished chemo -cancer free again
1/2014 ct scan results….distant mets
2/2014 ct result…spread to liver, kidneys, and lymph system
My opinions are my own and do not reflect the opinion of ABLCS or anyone else. I am not a doctor nor do I play one on TV.What I am about to post will not answer your questions, but I have to respond because whenever I hear (or in this case, read) the words “irritated area” the little hairs stand up on the back of my neck. If your Uro EVER says that about your cysto results, RUN do not walk to the best place to get another opinion. In my husband’s case, that “irritated area from BCG treatments” was really invasive and metatstatic bladder cancer. Strange thing about second opinions, “we” don’t really see the need if the news is not bad.
I am a caregiver to my wonderful husband, Ron
10/04 Multiple T1G3 – TURBT & 3 yrs BCG –
9/08 Invasive BLC w/distant mets
11/08 – 3/09 Gemzar/Cisplatin chemo regimen
4/09 Radiation to bone mets
6/09 lung and liver met progression – start ITP chemo
10/09 My darling Ron passed awaySign In to reply.
All services of the American Bladder Cancer Society are free of charge to everyone.
Information on this site is not intended as medical advice but rather to help you formulate questions for your medical team. If you are having a true medical emergency, please seek immediate attention at a qualified care facility or from a medical professional.
ABLCS is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization
© American Bladder Cancer Society, Inc.
Cookie Policy Acceptance RequiredCookies are used to ensure the best experience on our website. You must accept the Cookie Policy to create a forum post or to load the Contact Us form. If you do not accept the Cookie Policy, you cannot create an account, Sign In to the forum, or load the Contact Us form.Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.Cookie Policy Acceptance RequiredTo provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.