Thanks Zach, that was sweet and I'm glad you are among the living too, and part of this forum.
Acutally I began my search for a natural cure for my sister, when she had breast cancer in '97; I bought and cooked only the purest food, made juices, forced her to drink water and change her bad habits, though she had never smoked or drank, unlike moi. She also had chemo, surgery and radiation and a stem cell transplant-the most toxic treatment ever dreamed up. She was dead within 15 months. Sometimes nothing works, nothing at all.
When my other sister got bladder cancer right after that, I searched hard for natural things for her cancer too...and actually there was a lot of non-toxic things being studied back in '98 when I began that search, some of it still being investigated and some not; GLA (a fatty acid) was used instead of BCG and found to be helpful, KHL was a promising natural BCG substitute (not that BCG isn't natural cuz it is...but in a different way),garlic, tea and lots of things have been looked into, and found to be helpful. But not helpful enough to incorporate into treatment plans.
There is nothing to prevent us from using good quality things like fish oil and curcumin and a good vitamin. Lamm's Oncovite is for those on BCG, and his data said it helped (although, granted, it was a small trial).
I have a good article about 'chemoprevention'-another term for natural, healthy ways to prevent cancer from happening or recurring, by Ashish Kamat from MDAnderson, if anyone wants, let me know and I can forward, it's from the J of U, recent.
WebCafe's "Chemoprevention" section has been tracking natural complementary approaches; however the final conclusions are always the same: More study needed.
blcwebcafe.org/chemoprevention.asp
Drs. Lamm and Kamat have been at the forefront of investigating these non-toxic therapies for many years, both are highly respected in the field. Both studied garlic and tea, vitamins and many other things and sometimes published together. Kamat is an advisor for this site.
Maybe if a person who gets a cancer dx is depressed, that should be treated along with the cancer.
I'd seen cancer kill my father and sister, who did every treatment in vain. Actually promised myself if I ever got cancer to skip treatments and just party heartily till it was over. But when it actually happened that the lump was a tumor, my husband's face....plus, how could I go and die, I knew it would kill my remaining 2 big sisters and my mother. So I agreed to surgery, pathology was not good, had treatments and they were tough, too. More than I bargained for - but here I is...and I truly believe that if I hadn't started on Prozac about 2 months before my dx, I would have not gone for treatments. I had avoided medical treatments for 43 years up till that time (phobias).
Lucky for me I also have the constitution of an oxe, one of those types who never gets sick, aside from the occasional hangover (which was an occupational hazard for a blues singer
) and the very occasional tumor :
I've read that something like 20% of the population avoids medical treatments due to needle and other phobias, that it's actually a large problem. At least I'm not the only wimp out there! I'm not ashamed to admit I need 20mgs of valium before any kind of procedure or needle. I'm not on anti-depressants anymore, kicking them was very hard, but I suppose the trade off was worth in the end: getting long term survival after treatment for advanced cancer.
I'm lucky, actually. Very lucky.
Take good care,
Wendy
PS I'm not bragging, but I drink a couple of vodkas at cocktail hour everyday...remembering my doctors words, "Just be happy."