No more info than a pelvic mass. He couldn't even say for sure if it was on her ovary. She goes for a trans vaginal ultrasound on Monday morning. She has no uterus, but she did keep her ovaries because she was only 33 at the time of the hysterectomy. I guess I am just wondering if superficial bladder cancer can metastisize? i just assumed that if it were superficial it could not be anywhere else yet. Is that the wrong assumption? I am looking for the answer to this question, but can't seem to find it. Of course even if it isn't metastatic bladder cancer I guess she could have ovarian cancer too?! I know it could also be nothing, but given that she was just diagnosed with bc, we are thinking the worst and it's hard to shake that thought. I think we are also thrown by the fact that the Slaon doc missed this. Obviously he wasn't concerned about it because he told her to start BCG. When I called to update him yesterday he said not to start the BCG yet until we resolve this, so it seems to me he missed it! I would just like to have a little trust in one of her docs at this point.
My mom is prone to benign masses. She had a huge fibroid in her uterus, thus it's removal. She also has a hemangioma in her liver and a few years ago she had a few nodules in her tyroid -- all were benign. I keep reminding her of all of that, hoping that this pelvic mass may just be another benign mass, but it is hardly easing her mind.