BCG: confused

Not frustrated. I look forward to anything that may help. My question of concern was the long time lapse to begin the BCG, and would it still be as effective? Doc's office said the 8 weeks delay should still work. Still no answers as to when BCG works the best, if there is such a time? Scheduled for next Friday, after the meds regime. Hope the sample indicates no infection, whatever it is I have.

Hi Sara.
I thought the first 6 BCG's helped. I'm not avoiding them, was more curious if the lengthy time span to start would still be as effective.

Just a quickie update, the last cysto found another tumor which was removed, but the smallest so far. Doc recommended another round of BCG, but only 3, not the usual 6. That was put on hold because of the BCG shortage. Finally scheduled for treatment #1, they found an infection, so no treatment. Another delay to take some antibiotic. Doc called 4 days later, and increased the medication and dosage. Long story to confirm the mega dosage, and finally get the (expensive) pills. Hell, by the time I take these, then re-check the infection, I'll be about due for another cysto.
So my question is: how long should someone wait to receive BCG? My thoughts are that too much time has passed, and the BCG would not be as effective now? Should I just wait for the next cysto, and no treatment? If they find even a tiny tumor, they don't just fill you up with BCG hoping to kill it. The tumor is removed first. I have not seen anything regarding a time frame for the best use of BCG. Thanks.