Forum

× Welcome click the New Topic button to post

Can you help me understand

8 years 3 weeks ago #35052 by jj803
From what I see here, Mike is right, specimen did not survive processing so no one knows what was there at the time of the initial biopsy. As to NMP-22, cytology and cystoscopy; cystoscopy is the gold standard for diagnosis of bc. There are false negatives, but I doubt as high as 30% unless the study group is limited to only certain categories of patients. Cytology is quite good with high grade lesions, perhaps better than any of the surrogate tests (such as NMP and others), but is not as good with low grade lesions. The specificity of cytology is better than the surrogate tests (meaning that a positive is more likely to be bc in the case of positive cytology than positive surrogate (such as NMP). Nmp false positives seem to be higher in cases of bladder inflammation. I also believe that adding the fluorescent aspect to cystoscopy greatly improves its sensitivity (ability to detect lesions) particularly for CIS. Best wishes,

jj

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

8 years 3 weeks ago #35043 by mmc
The initial post said that the sample was destroyed before there person when to the Herr. Maybe I misinterpreted but I'm not sure how Herr can find anything if he's not given anything to look at.

If there was CIS but it was destroyed and there was no pathology to analyze, and if the there isn't any visible CIS still in the bladder, then I would guess that Herr would want to be on the safe side and therefore set up a surveillance schedule to keep an eye on things.

Maybe there were slides, but the message didn't indicate that...

Mike

Age 54
10/31/06 dx CIS (TisG3) non-invasive (at 47)
9/19/08 TURB/TUIP dx Invasive T2G3
10/8/08 RC neobladder(at 49)
2/15/13 T4G3N3M1 distant metastases(at 53)
9/2013 finished chemo -cancer free again
1/2014 ct scan results....distant mets
2/2014 ct result...spread to liver, kidneys, and lymph...

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

8 years 3 weeks ago - 8 years 3 weeks ago #35042 by Alan
Just wanted to chime in with Pat's observation of microhematuria. I personally have 2 friends that no known causation. They have had it off and on for 20+ years. So it's not unusual-just not common.

DX 5/6/2008 TAG3 papillary tumor .5 CM in size. 2 TURBS followed by 6 instillations of BCG weekly with a second round of 6 after a 6 week wait.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

8 years 3 weeks ago #35041 by Patricia
Believe me if it were CIS Herr would have caught it from the margins or even from the destroyed slides. He caught mine and completely excised it. He's pretty much a genius.
pat

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

8 years 3 weeks ago #35039 by mmc
Osiag,

It may have ruled out residual cancer but who knows about the original issue? It could have been CIS, which has a high recurrence rate so you want to be on monitoring. I'm not sure how they could rule out bladder cancer given the red spot could have been CIS but was destroyed prior to pathology analysis.

I know about NMP-22. They did both cytology and NMP-22 tests on my urine. Pat can probably point you to the research on which is better.

The blue light is supposed to be much better than the white light at seeing things.

To send a PM to Pat, go to one of her posts. Under the picture it says whether a person is online or offline, then has a small box with "PM" in it, the a longer box with "Profile". Click on the PM box. It takes you to the message screen. Once you type your message in, there is small box underneath the character count box on the left hand side. Under that is a box that has the word "Send" in it. It is pretty much invisible though because it is black type on dark blue background. You'll find it though.

Mike

Age 54
10/31/06 dx CIS (TisG3) non-invasive (at 47)
9/19/08 TURB/TUIP dx Invasive T2G3
10/8/08 RC neobladder(at 49)
2/15/13 T4G3N3M1 distant metastases(at 53)
9/2013 finished chemo -cancer free again
1/2014 ct scan results....distant mets
2/2014 ct result...spread to liver, kidneys, and lymph...

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

8 years 3 weeks ago #35038 by Patricia
osiag.....well you got the premier Bladder cancer specialist...he got all of mine out plus margins and with white light...i would be very surprised if he missed something especially using the newer technology.plus he did a urogram which would wash out any stray cells. Its good that he's going to follow through in December. Microhematuria can happen in some cases and they never find the cause. It happens a lot with runners, people who exercise heavily.....or for no particular reason. I think you're in good hands.
if you want to send a private message just hit the PM under my name and voila!!
pat

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Not Allowed: to create new topic.
  • Not Allowed: to reply.
  • Not Allowed: to add attachements.
  • Not Allowed: to edit your message.
Moderators: Cynthiaeddieksara.anne

Users

Total Online: 1 User and 373 Guests 
lee83's Avatarlee83

Legend: Site Administrator Global Moderator Moderator Banned User Guest

Statistics

Total Messages: 50846 Total Sections: 1 Today Open: 1 Today Total Answer: 10
Total Subjects: 6515 Total Categories: 11 Yesterday Open: 1 Yesterday Total Answer: 5
Total Users: 7772 Latest User: AussieG
Powered by Kunena Forum